Skip to content
Radiant Garden Review

Editorial policy

Radiant Garden Review aims to make garden design easier to understand through careful wording, clear distinctions and corrections when something is wrong. We separate general explanation from opinion and avoid presenting a single aesthetic choice as a universal rule.

Accuracy and clarity

We check claims against information available to us and take care with descriptions of design, plants, materials and history. When a point is uncertain or depends on context, we say so rather than making it sound settled. Readers can contact us through the Contact page to flag an error or unclear passage.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial decisions are kept distinct from commercial arrangements. Any sponsored or partner material is clearly labelled where it appears, so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial coverage. A partnership does not guarantee favourable coverage or editorial approval.

Corrections and illustrations

When we confirm a material error, we correct the relevant text and make the change clear where appropriate. Some illustrations may be AI-generated; these are identified as such when used. Illustrations are visual aids, not evidence that a pictured garden, plant or design has been observed in person.

Our point of view

A garden is more than its plants.

Its paths, edges, materials and changing light all affect what we notice. We look at gardens as compositions shaped by many connected choices.

About the review